The Method Of Agreement In Historical And Comparative Research Was Developed By

Nevertheless, it is of course reasonable to doubt that the world functions in such a deterministic way. In fact, it is precisely for this reason that Mahoney discusses “probabilistic causality.” on the basis of individual and rational action, the exact definitions being very different. Some of the most important scholars in this mode were Alexis de Tocqueville,[3] Karl Marx,[4] Emile Durkheim,[5] Max Weber,[6] and W.E.B du Bois. [7] The second wave reacted to a perceived ahistorical theoretical body and tried to show that social systems were not static, but evolved over time. [8] Notable authors of this wave are Barrington Moore, Jr.,[9] Theda Skocpol,[10] Charles Tilly,[11] Michael Mann,[12] and Mark Gould. [13] Some have classified the Annales school and Pierre Bourdieu in this general group despite their stylistic differences. Researcher Julia Adams draws on both original archival work and secondary sources to analyze how merchant families with noble families competed for influence in the First Dutch Republic. [26] She argues that these competitions gave rise to the political institutions that became the modern Dutch state, often referring to England and France. . .

.